Skip to content
Cloud Mechanics
QA Agent iconAI Agent

QA Agent

QA Agent that automates it & engineering workflows using your data and tools.

The challenge

Regression testing is a manual pass squeezed in before release, so coverage follows whoever wrote the script rather than business risk. Flaky tests get ignored until a real failure hides among them, and defects escape into production with no record of what was actually tested.

The outcome

A Microsoft Foundry agent derives cases from the requirement and the change, Azure OpenAI generates the tests and safe synthetic data, and Azure Container Apps runs the suites in parallel across environments. Real defects are separated from flake automatically, and a human signs off every release.

At a glance

Type
ai agents
Category
technical

Next step

Move from solution to engagement.

Build This Solution

01 — Architecture

End-to-end architecture

A requirement and its change are read for testable risk. The Foundry agent derives cases to cover that risk rather than the code, generates safe synthetic test data, runs the suites across environments and separates real defects from flake — but a human signs off every release decision.

TEAMTester /Developerquality gateSOURCEGitHubcode & test suitesTeams / Boardstest casesEXECUTIONAzure ContainerAppstest runnersAzure LoadTestingperformance runsAI & AGENTMicrosoft FoundryAgentdesign & triageAzure OpenAImodelscases & defectsAzure AI Searchspecs & past defectsAzure AI ContentSafetytest data guardrailsDATA & RECORDSAzure SQLruns & defectsAzure Cosmos DBexecution stateAzure BlobStorageevidence & tracesDECISION & INSIGHTQA sign-offrelease decisionApplicationInsightsproduction signalsPower BI / Fabriccoverage & escapesDEVOPS & DELIVERYGitHubsource control & CIDockercontainer buildContainer Registryversioned imagesRunner releasedeploy with rollback
Figure 1 — End-to-end reference architecture for a quality engineering agent on the Microsoft stack.
  • Team: Tester / Developer
  • Source: GitHub, Teams / Boards
  • Execution: Azure Container Apps, Azure Load Testing
  • AI & agent: Microsoft Foundry Agent, Azure OpenAI models, Azure AI Search, Azure AI Content Safety
  • Data & records: Azure SQL, Azure Cosmos DB, Azure Blob Storage
  • Decision & insight: QA sign-off, Application Insights, Power BI / Fabric

02 — Workflow

Process & decision workflow

How a change becomes an evidenced release recommendation — analyse, design, generate, execute and triage, then branch. Green gates produce a release recommendation with the coverage published, while a real defect or a coverage gap stops the release and goes to QA for sign-off.

1AnalyseRequirement and change read for testablerisk2DesignCases derived to cover the risk, not thecode3GenerateAutomated tests and safe test dataproduced4ExecuteSuites run across environments andbrowsers5TriageFailures separated into real defects andflake6ReportCoverage, risk and release readinesssummarisedQuality gatesatisfied?Path 1 · gates greenRecommend releaseCoverage, risk and evidence publishedPath 2 · real defect or coverage gapQA sign-off neededFailure, evidence and risk presentedDefect raisedSteps, evidence and severityrecordedQuality reportedCoverage and escape ratepublishedCloserelease assessed
Figure 2 — Analyse → design → generate → execute → triage → gate branch → recommend release or QA sign-off.
  1. Analyse: Requirement and change read for testable risk
  2. Design: Cases derived to cover the risk, not the code
  3. Generate: Automated tests and safe test data produced
  4. Execute: Suites run across environments and browsers
  5. Triage: Failures separated into real defects and flake
  6. Report: Coverage, risk and release readiness summarised
  7. Path 1 · gates greenRecommend release: Coverage, risk and evidence published
  8. Path 2 · real defect or coverage gapQA sign-off needed: Failure, evidence and risk presented

03 — Components

Key Microsoft components

Test results only matter if they are honest — design, execution, triage and evidence all stay on the Microsoft stack.

  • GitHub iconGitHubCode, test suites and continuous integration triggers.
  • Microsoft Teams / Boards iconMicrosoft Teams / BoardsTest cases, defects and release collaboration.
  • Azure Container Apps iconAzure Container AppsParallel test runners across environments and browsers.
  • Azure Load Testing iconAzure Load TestingPerformance and scalability regression runs.
  • Microsoft Foundry Agent Service iconMicrosoft Foundry Agent ServiceTest design, execution and triage orchestration.
  • Azure OpenAI models iconAzure OpenAI modelsCase derivation, test authoring and defect write-up.
  • Azure AI Search iconAzure AI SearchRetrieval over specifications, past defects and coverage.
  • Azure AI Content Safety iconAzure AI Content SafetyGuardrails on synthetic test data and personal information.
  • Azure API Management iconAzure API ManagementSecure gateway for test harness and service virtualisation.
  • Azure SQL iconAzure SQLTest runs, results, defects and coverage records.
  • Azure Cosmos DB iconAzure Cosmos DBExecution state, retries and flake history.
  • Azure Blob Storage iconAzure Blob StorageScreenshots, traces, logs and test evidence.
  • Azure Application Insights iconAzure Application InsightsProduction signals that close the feedback loop.
  • Power BI / Microsoft Fabric iconPower BI / Microsoft FabricCoverage, escape rate and release-readiness dashboards.

04 — AI

What the agent consumes

The capabilities the agent applies to every release candidate, and the line it does not cross.

AI capabilities embedded in the agent

  • Risk-based test design
  • Requirement analysis
  • Test case generation
  • Test data synthesis
  • Automated execution
  • Flake detection
  • Failure triage
  • Visual and accessibility checks
  • Performance regression detection
  • Defect summarisation
  • Coverage analytics
  • Release-readiness reporting

AI responsibility boundaries

The agent tests and reports; a human signs off every release. It does not delete or weaken a failing test, mark a real defect as flake without evidence, or use production personal data as test data. A gate that is not satisfied stays visibly unsatisfied rather than being reclassified.

05 — Personalization

Personalization & evolving process

The same methodology applies to every agent in the catalog. Tune the product risk, the testing template, the gates and the value model — the page structure stays identical.

Product & risk profile

Define the applications, platforms, browsers, critical journeys and regulatory testing obligations in scope. The personas are the tester, the developer, the release manager and the product owner.

06 — Impact

Key outcomes & business impact

Starting targets for the value case — validate each one against the customer baseline during discovery.

  • Test coverageRisk-basedCoverage follows business risk rather than code paths.
  • Regression cycle−60%Suites run in parallel on every change, not per release.
  • Escaped defects−35%More critical journeys covered before production.
  • Triage effort−50%Flake is separated from real failure automatically.

Illustrative improvement index

Manual baseline = 100. Illustrative targets, not a commitment — confirm against the customer baseline.

10040Regression cycle time10050Triage hours10065Escaped defectsManual baselineAI-assisted target
  • Regression cycle time: manual baseline 100, AI-assisted target 40
  • Triage hours: manual baseline 100, AI-assisted target 50
  • Escaped defects: manual baseline 100, AI-assisted target 65

Related & recommended

Derived automatically from our solution knowledge graph.

Related AI agents

Other agents that pair well with this one.

Related professional services

How we design, build and secure it.

Related quick wins

Ready-made Azure AI to start fast.

Technologies

What powers this solution.

Related managed services

Keep it running and optimised.

Ready to move from challenge to solution?

Talk to a Cloud Mechanics expert or build your solution in minutes.